Published in full

How we rate brokers

One score out of 100, applied identically to every broker. Our sites present it differently - as stars, out of ten, or raw - but the underlying number and the ranking it produces are the same everywhere.

What we measure

Regulation
Which authority licenses the entity you would actually open an account with, and under what number. Weighted highest, because it decides what happens to your money if the firm fails.
Trading costs
Spread and commission together, taken from the broker's published schedule rather than a promotional page. A raw spread with a high commission can cost more than a wider all-in one.
Platforms
What you would actually trade on, and whether your setup transfers if you later leave.
Access
Retail leverage, markets covered, and how money gets in and out - including whether the withdrawal routes match the deposit ones.
Minimum deposit
What it costs to start, in the currency the broker quotes.
Transparency
Whether all of the above can be found without contacting a salesperson. If the terms need a phone call, that counts against them.

What we ignore

Bonuses and sign-up offers carry no weight. They change monthly, they are almost always conditional on trading volume, and rating them would reward marketing budgets rather than trading conditions.

Where the figures come from

Each broker's own published material in the first instance, recorded with the date it was compiled. Every broker is shown their own review and asked to confirm it before we treat it as settled, and corrections are made on evidence rather than on request.

Where we hold no confirmed figure, the review says so. An empty field is more useful than a plausible guess.

How we are paid

Some brokers pay us a commission when a reader opens an account through our link, at no extra cost to the reader. It has no bearing on the score: the measures above are applied the same way to brokers who pay us and brokers who do not, and several brokers listed here have no commercial relationship with us at all.